|
dispute resolutionThe College uses Dispute Resolution (DR) to facilitate the resolution of suitable complaints regarding members of the profession. DR is voluntary and without prejudice to the parties. The results of the DR process are similar to those that would be expected following a full investigation and/or contested hearing. The members in the cases reported here have consented to the publication of a summary of the complaint and its resolution. Member: Not identified Following notification by an employer the Registrar initiated a complaint against a member of the College. The Registrar alleged that, in response to a student aggressively bumping into him, the member was involved in a physical altercation with a male secondary school student. On July 25, 2006 the Investigation Committee ratified a memorandum of agreement (MOA) between the member and the College in which the member:
Member: Not identified Following notification by an employer the Registrar initiated a complaint against a member of the College. The Registrar alleged that the member had searched for, accessed, viewed and downloaded adult pornographic Internet web sites on his classroom desktop computer. On July 25, 2006 the Investigation Committee ratified an MOA between the member and the College in which the member:
Member: Not identified Following notification by an employer the Registrar initiated a complaint against a member of the College. The Registrar alleged that the member continued to telephone and e-mail a former colleague despite her having told him she was not interested in having a personal relationship with him. The member also involved two secondary school students in attempts to learn more about the member. On July 25, 2006 the Investigation Committee ratified an MOA between the member and the College in which:
Member: Not identified Following notification by an employer the Registrar initiated a complaint against a member of the College. The Registrar alleged that the member:
On August 28, 2006 the Investigation Committee ratified an MOA between the member and the College in which the member agreed:
Member: Mario Rossi Following notification by the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Registrar initiated a complaint against Mario Rossi. The Registrar alleged that the member:
In June 2006 the member was convicted of sexual exploitation with respect to the above allegations. On September 20, 2006 the Investigation Committee ratified an MOA between the member and the College in which the member agreed:
When the Discipline Committee finds a member guilty of professional misconduct the member's name is routinely published in Professionally Speaking. If a similar matter is disposed of by the Investigation Committee or DR at the investigation stage, and the result is a caution, the name of the member is not published. The College monitors compliance with all agreements reached through DR. |